|
Something wrong with historical tester |
HAPPYMAN
|
Post subject: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Mon 30 Sep, 2013, 22:20
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Tue 10 Jul, 2012, 11:51 Posts: 25 Location: Czech Republic,
|
|
|
|
|
Fusion
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Mon 30 Sep, 2013, 23:48
|
|
User rating: 3
Joined: Tue 09 Oct, 2012, 11:59 Posts: 20 Location: Finland, Turku
|
Does it with MA's also 20 sift is 40 etc, makes it a pain in the... been just halving the value for visual and trying to remember it for normal.
|
|
|
|
|
HAPPYMAN
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Mon 07 Oct, 2013, 20:00
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Tue 10 Jul, 2012, 11:51 Posts: 25 Location: Czech Republic,
|
Hi vjf support, Can you please give us an estimate when this will be fixed? Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
dirk_r1
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 08 Oct, 2013, 07:21
|
|
Visual JForex expert at Dukascopy | |
User rating: 27
Joined: Fri 03 May, 2013, 18:25 Posts: 366 Location: GermanyGermany
|
Greetings! I do not see any errors on that! Please bear in mind that "shift 0" means the current candle (in that expample), "shift 1" last candle and so on. Hence it follows that in your picture the marked candles are wrong - it has to be every last candle. When i tested the strategy i did not see any errors or bugs
|
|
|
|
|
HAPPYMAN
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 08 Oct, 2013, 11:25
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Tue 10 Jul, 2012, 11:51 Posts: 25 Location: Czech Republic,
|
Hi, thanks for your reply. I must do something wrong or miss something. Or maybe a bug is there.. Please try to run the strategy again and put there a breakpoint in the end. When you get first 5min candle, the indicator get some values: shift1=value a, shift2=value b, shift3=value c, etc.. when you get 2nd 5min candle, values should be shifted by 1: shift2=value a, shift3=value b, shift4=value c but it doesn't work this way. you get totally different numbers. Right after 3rd candle, you get the values that you're supposed to get at 2nd candle. It seems to me that shift(x) actually returns value of shift(x*2) Hope it's understandable. PS: tested by historical tester in vjf (last week data).
|
|
|
|
|
Fusion
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 08 Oct, 2013, 14:08
|
|
User rating: 3
Joined: Tue 09 Oct, 2012, 11:59 Posts: 20 Location: Finland, Turku
|
|
|
|
|
HAPPYMAN
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Mon 21 Oct, 2013, 21:03
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Tue 10 Jul, 2012, 11:51 Posts: 25 Location: Czech Republic,
|
Hi gentlemen, sorry for bothering again. Is there anything new about this? It seems the problem still persists. Thx
|
|
|
|
|
dirk_r1
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 22 Oct, 2013, 08:56
|
|
Visual JForex expert at Dukascopy | |
User rating: 27
Joined: Fri 03 May, 2013, 18:25 Posts: 366 Location: GermanyGermany
|
Hi guys! I did test it again and I created an investigation. Unfortunately it seems that you are right! Thank you for your that!
|
|
|
|
|
Curz36EU
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 31 Oct, 2013, 20:54
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Sat 05 Oct, 2013, 13:54 Posts: 6 Location: SpainSpain
|
Same problem with MACD. Takes the values of shifted histograms multiplying by 2, and another thing. With every new candle, the histogram shifted by 1 is moved 1 position back. So, with the first candle, it's all ok. With the next candle, shifted 1 takes the value of the previous candle#2, shifted 2 candle#4, shifted 3 candle#6. With the next candle, shifted 1 now is previous candle#3, shifted 2 candle#5, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
sakud
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sat 02 Nov, 2013, 14:17
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Tue 22 Oct, 2013, 16:46 Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
HAPPYMAN
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Mon 18 Nov, 2013, 19:45
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Tue 10 Jul, 2012, 11:51 Posts: 25 Location: Czech Republic,
|
Hello gentlemen, any guess when we can expect this fixed? Many thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
vadim_berezhnoj
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 11 Dec, 2013, 12:22
|
|
Visual JForex expert at Dukascopy | |
User rating: ∞
Joined: Mon 22 Apr, 2013, 11:30 Posts: 604 Location: UkraineUkraine
|
Greeting.
It will be fixed in the next version update.
Keep Calm and Carry On.
|
|
|
|
|
gisforgringo
|
Post subject: Re: Something wrong with historical tester |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 17 Dec, 2013, 17:32
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Wed 20 Nov, 2013, 07:35 Posts: 7 Location: United Kingdom,
|
Hi, what is the ETA for the update?
Is there a workaround? ie somehow change the JFX code, once have built the strategy in VJFX?
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [
1
]
|
|
|
|
|