|
Attention! Read the forum rules carefully before posting a topic.
Try to find an answer in Wiki before asking a question.
Submit programming questions in this forum only.
Off topics are strictly forbidden.
Any topics which do not satisfy these rules will be deleted.
| Genetic optimizer |
|
[darlu72]
|
| Post subject: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sat 23 Oct, 2010, 06:09
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 19 Aug, 2010, 13:53
Posts: 62
|
|
Hi,
Is there any chance in the next period, 2-3 months, to have a genetic optimizer instead this simple one for JForex?
Currently I am getting old using this optimizer which do the things using all possible combinations.
Genetic method will make us much more happy.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[quantisan]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sat 23 Oct, 2010, 13:31
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Fri 26 Mar, 2010, 19:19
Posts: 116
Location: Canada
|
|
I'd rather implement my own optimizer through the API. Because you don't know what they are doing to the algorithm. It's better transparency for JForex to just be plain but robust.
Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[darlu72]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sat 23 Oct, 2010, 21:54
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 19 Aug, 2010, 13:53
Posts: 62
|
quantisan wrote: I'd rather implement my own optimizer through the API. Because you don't know what they are doing to the algorithm. It's better transparency for JForex to just be plain but robust.
Just my two cents. This means I should not trust in their algorithm ? The genetic optimizer is a must, especially for multipairs strategy optimization. We should trust in it, why not ? It is in interes for both parties Dukascopy & developers. You know what is written on any US dollar banknote: "In God We Trust."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quantisan]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sun 24 Oct, 2010, 02:58
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Fri 26 Mar, 2010, 19:19
Posts: 116
Location: Canada
|
|
I just find it more convenient if I have control over my programs. I like to tweak things. That's just my approach.
We have different style, that's all.
However, I do agree with you that the optimizer can do with some improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dedalus
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sun 07 Nov, 2010, 04:01
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Tue 24 May, 2011, 00:41
Posts: 38
Location: United KingdomUnited Kingdom
|
Quote: I'd rather implement my own optimizer through the API. quantisan, what do you exactly mean? Using @Library inside the platform to link to external code? Or do you have other ways to run external code? Were you referring to this specific option? thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quantisan]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 09 Nov, 2010, 02:11
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Fri 26 Mar, 2010, 19:19
Posts: 116
Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Saidar]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 16:26
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Tue 07 Dec, 2010, 10:51
Posts: 39
|
|
I don't want to sound mean or anything but I find JForex's tester rather amusing compared to MT5's tester.
I know MT's data cannot be trusted but at least I can get my results within an hour compared to months I'll have to wait for a test in JTrader. I mean I cannot even complete 20 optimization passes it takes literally forever.
Dukascopy are you telling me you cannot do any better than the current tester?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quantisan]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 16:30
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Fri 26 Mar, 2010, 19:19
Posts: 116
Location: Canada
|
a feature request ticket has been generated, so they're developing a solution for it. P.S. @Saidar, I'm not stalking you 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Saidar]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 16:37
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Tue 07 Dec, 2010, 10:51
Posts: 39
|
quantisan wrote: a feature request ticket has been generated, so they're developing a solution for it. P.S. @Saidar, I'm not stalking you That's good to hear, JTrader will be a dream come true if they can improve the tester. Quantisan I guess you don't have too much to do at work hehe 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quantisan]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 16:51
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Fri 26 Mar, 2010, 19:19
Posts: 116
Location: Canada
|
|
no, but I wish! Just having some downtime and burning some minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Saidar]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 16:55
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Tue 07 Dec, 2010, 10:51
Posts: 39
|
quantisan wrote: no, but I wish! Just having some downtime and burning some minutes You are an engineer right? Let me guess computer/electronics ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quantisan]
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 19:13
|
|
User rating: 1
Joined: Fri 26 Mar, 2010, 19:19
Posts: 116
Location: Canada
|
yes and yes Saidar wrote: You are an engineer right? Let me guess computer/electronics ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
| Post subject: Re: Genetic optimizer |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 09 Dec, 2010, 20:52
|
|
User rating: -
|
quantisan wrote: yes and yes Saidar wrote: You are an engineer right? Let me guess computer/electronics ? Thought so, I'm in my final year chemical
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
Pages: [
1
]
|
|
|
|
|
