|
Attention! Read the forum rules carefully before posting a topic.
Try to find an answer in Wiki before asking a question.
Submit programming questions in this forum only.
Off topics are strictly forbidden.
Any topics which do not satisfy these rules will be deleted.
| Feature request processing |
|
hyperscalper
|
| Post subject: Feature request processing |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 18 Jun, 2013, 19:13
|
|
User rating: 98
Joined: Mon 23 Jul, 2012, 02:02
Posts: 656
Location: United States, Durham, NC
|
|
API development seems to have less engineering resources, since there are so many other projects happening, it seems to me. The last API 2.7.9 update was about Feb 22, and we are mid-June now.
HyperScalper
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Isak
|
| Post subject: Re: Isolate IClient state |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 18 Jun, 2013, 21:03
|
|
User rating: 6
Joined: Thu 19 May, 2011, 11:14
Posts: 235
Location: South Africa,
|
|
Ah, that explains a lot...
I hope they come back because I've been building a large application on this foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hyperscalper
|
| Post subject: Re: Isolate IClient state |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 19 Jun, 2013, 01:46
|
|
User rating: 98
Joined: Mon 23 Jul, 2012, 02:02
Posts: 656
Location: United States, Durham, NC
|
|
I also have a large app and a commitment, so I hope the same.... HyperScalper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hyperscalper
|
| Post subject: How API enhancement requests are handled |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 20 Jun, 2013, 15:22
|
|
User rating: 98
Joined: Mon 23 Jul, 2012, 02:02
Posts: 656
Location: United States, Durham, NC
|
|
All that I am saying is that those of us who are heavily invested in this platform should probably have a more "systematic" (rather than ad hoc) way of formulating requests, and justifying them.
Maybe using the Telefision interactive platform, perhaps, for technical meetings, might also be a way of discussing proposed changes to the API but, at the very least, a formal requesting mechanism would be so much better than this support forum where requests are ad hoc, and approval process seems informal.
HyperScalper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kurak777
|
| Post subject: Re: Isolate IClient state |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 20 Jun, 2013, 19:02
|
|
User rating: 7
Joined: Fri 13 Jan, 2012, 20:49
Posts: 94
Location: Poland, Warsaw
|
|
Hi, I fully agree with HyperScalper. BR, Kurak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tcsabina
|
| Post subject: Re: Isolate IClient state |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 21 Jun, 2013, 12:13
|
|
User rating: 164
Joined: Mon 08 Oct, 2012, 10:35
Posts: 676
Location: NetherlandsNetherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hyperscalper
|
| Post subject: Re: Feature request processing |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Sat 22 Jun, 2013, 00:10
|
|
User rating: 98
Joined: Mon 23 Jul, 2012, 02:02
Posts: 656
Location: United States, Durham, NC
|
Yes, that's it. I requested that it be filed in API Feature Requests, and it was placed in Trading Platforms FAQs. It's just the Ad Hoc nature of how requests in this forum are handled. Now, really, is that a "Frequently Asked Question" to provide an optional wider DOM feed to the strategy module?  I think not. It is simply an arbitrary classification which represents that this forum needs a Systematic way of registering requests, and not just what "mood" a developer happens to be in, at the time s/he reads the forum post.......... I keep my sense of humor... At the time of this writing, the request was filed in FAQs, not in Feature Requests. viewtopic.php?f=81&t=48079HyperScalper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tcsabina
|
| Post subject: Re: Feature request processing |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Mon 24 Jun, 2013, 11:59
|
|
User rating: 164
Joined: Mon 08 Oct, 2012, 10:35
Posts: 676
Location: NetherlandsNetherlands
|
Quote: I requested that it be filed in API Feature Requests, and it was placed in Trading Platforms FAQs. And I was wondering why I have to use Search instead of browsing the Feature requests posts to find that topic... Anyway, it seems that you are right. Sad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
Pages: [
1
]
|
|
|
|
|
