|
| General Discussion and Comments |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: is it OK ? |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 15 Sep, 2010, 10:06
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
Guest wrote: Contest Support wrote: You will not be disqualified.
This is our over-the-weekend policy which can not be avoided. Over the weekend the maximum available leverage is 1:30
If the use of leverage exceeds 200% when the weekend policy kicks in, we will cut the exposure to use of leverage = 100%. 200% conditionaly closes just at the weekend or it is even for usually business day? thanks When the use of leverage equals to 200%, the system decreases the exposure by opening new hedging trades. The use of leverage will be reduced to 100%. It does not matter when margin cut took place.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[Frank]
|
| Post subject: ERROR when sending order |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 15 Sep, 2010, 17:24
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 02 Sep, 2010, 05:01 Posts: 49
|
Hi Contest Support, I need your help. I tested my strategy with Historical Tester without trouble, but when I ran it with demo account (local run) I received the following message from server: the first order was with equity = 100000 lot number = 383.05 amount = 3830500 but the server replied "Insufficient margin. Filling maximum allowed amount 7689000" and opened the first position with maximum amount (using all margin) the first position was closed with profit equity = 130473 then the line that calculates lot is very simple double equity = this.account.getEquity(); int percent = 50; int margin = 100;
lots = (equity *percent/100)/ (margin * bidBar.getOpen()) ; when the strategy sent the second order the server replied "Your order has been rejected due to validation failure. order amount can't be greater than 500'000'000" Best regards, Frank
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
pipstown
|
| Post subject: Re: ERROR when sending order |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 15 Sep, 2010, 17:47
|
|
User rating: -
|
|
Hi Frank, if i understand your stuff correctly you are using the open price to calculate your lot size.
I am not sure what's the deal behind that; could you develop?
The code i am using manage the lot size depending of the stoploss and looks like the following:
EqAtRisk=5; stopLoss=20; //20 pips tickValue=1000000*instrument.getPipValue(); //1M is Dukascopy standard size riskAmount = this.acctEquity * this.EqAtRisk/100; myLot = (riskAmount/stopLoss)/tickValue;
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guest
|
| Post subject: Re: General Discussion and Comments |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 15 Sep, 2010, 20:08
|
|
User rating: -
|
|
So booth (weekend and business day) rules close at 200%? (weekend particualry, business whole) am I right?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: ERROR when sending order |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 17 Sep, 2010, 14:49
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
Frank wrote: Hi Contest Support,
the first order was with equity = 100000 lot number = 383.05 amount = 3830500
when the strategy sent the second order the server replied "Your order has been rejected due to validation failure. order amount can't be greater than 500'000'000"
Best regards, Frank Hi Frank! Lot amount is indicated in millions. The validation message says that the order amount is too big. Please check it in the scrip. You don't need to indicate the amount in units or thousands!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: General Discussion and Comments |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 17 Sep, 2010, 15:04
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
Guest wrote: So booth (weekend and business day) rules close at 200%? (weekend particualry, business whole) am I right? The mechanism is the same. Once the use of leverage reached 200%, the system reduced the exposure to 100% of the equity. The only difference is in leverage. Over-the-weekend leverage is 1:30, while the normal leverage is 1:100.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: General Discussion and Comments |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 21 Sep, 2010, 15:57
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
|
It's nearly the end of September and the current top3 traders haven't reached the necessary amount of trades, so PipsCity has a good chance on taking this one.
Also dear traders! Prepare your strategies very carefully for October, we are expecting some serious competition.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dejalascorrer
|
| Post subject: Re: General Discussion and Comments |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Tue 21 Sep, 2010, 20:09
|
|
User rating: -
|
|
Hi, I am developing the code for the next October contest, but I have 3 questions:
-My account appears as 'inactive', so I can not compile the strategy code. - Where I must compile the code? Which steps i must follow? -What happens if a first position winner can not fly to get the Watch and be suitable for a interview?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: General Discussion and Comments |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 22 Sep, 2010, 08:49
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
|
- You need to register for the month of October and you will receive a new demo account. - You must compile the code on the platform. You can read more on how to compile and run a simple strategy on our website ('Forex Trading' -> 'JForex' -> 'Documentation' -> 'Getting started'). - Participants of the strategy contest are eligible only to the prize money. Please read the contest rules on our website ('Forex Trading' -> 'JForex' -> JForex contest'). You can win the watch if you are a live trader.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: General Discussion and Comments |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 22 Sep, 2010, 10:04
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
We have a new email address of our JForex Contes Support Team: [email protected]If you need any assistance or help, please forward questions to our Support Team by email or post them right in the forum.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[darlu72]
|
| Post subject: The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is 1 |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 23 Sep, 2010, 06:37
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 19 Aug, 2010, 13:53 Posts: 62
|
|
Hi,
'The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is 1' What is the main reason for this rule in the contest ? I think it is useless. It blocks me to trade multicurrency pairs, eg correlation and cointegration between EURUSD and USDCHF and others similar. For example if both pairs are in 'oversold' zone on a specific timeframe then there is a very good chance one to revert back since these 2 pairs are negatively correlated. There is no real reason both to be in the same oscillator extreme area; just an example; and I had a lot of ideas to test using multicurrencies/instruments at once. I would appreciate this rule to be removed from Octomber onward. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 23 Sep, 2010, 09:21
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
|
The idea is to prevent gambling and extreme positioning.
This matter is discussed in "General discussion and comments", starting from page 6.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[soulsurfer]
|
| Post subject: Re: The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 23 Sep, 2010, 09:27
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Fri 02 Apr, 2010, 19:59 Posts: 20 Location: South West England
|
Hi Darlu darlu72 wrote: What is the main reason for this rule in the contest ? I think it is useless. It blocks me to trade multicurrency pairs.
I'll second that. If you want to trade forex as a business rather than as mere "gambling" then diversification of both systems and pairs is vital. I too would much appreciate it if this rule could be modified to permit multi-currency trading in the October contest. How about it Dukascopy? Jim P.S. Whoops! - Was typing that in when support's post appeared. I'll head over there now.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[Frank]
|
| Post subject: Are they simple Coincidences ? |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 23 Sep, 2010, 18:30
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 02 Sep, 2010, 05:01 Posts: 49
|
|
Hi Contest Support, I noted that the number of Total Trades of partecipant "ipleX" and the number of Total Trades of partecipant "daffyduck" seem increasing synchronized and even the times of trades appear similar. Are they simple Coincidences ? Could you, Constest Support, investigate, please? (verifing IP addresses, starting and ending times of strategy, ... and so on).
Best regards, Frank
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[darlu72]
|
| Post subject: Re: The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 24 Sep, 2010, 06:45
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 19 Aug, 2010, 13:53 Posts: 62
|
|
Ok, I am a bit unclear what means a position. The question is: - May I have instant orders SELL and BUY in the same time on the same pair ? Is this considered only 1 position ? In the Positions group tab I noted 1 postion but in the Positions tab I have 3, which are in fact 3 instant separate orders SELL, BUY, SELL on the same pair. Are these 3 different positions ? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 24 Sep, 2010, 08:26
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
|
They are considered as three different positions. This is not allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[darlu72]
|
| Post subject: Re: The maximum amount of simultaneously opened positions is |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 24 Sep, 2010, 09:23
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Thu 19 Aug, 2010, 13:53 Posts: 62
|
|
I asked because I found many participants including the ones that are/were in the top using trades like below. Maybe I am missing something. I dont blame anyone, just want make things clear for me. thank you.
user removed USD/CHF SELL 3253.33K @ 1.01020 Friday, September 17, 2010, 9:00:00 PM xxx; Regular; 10323956; SHORT; USD/CHF; -3253330; 3286513.96; 1.01020; 0.98240; 90442.58; 92062.89
USD/CHF SELL 5333.33K @ 1.00698 Friday, September 17, 2010, 4:55:37 PM xxx; Regular; 10313688; SHORT; USD/CHF; -5333330; 5370529.97; 1.00698; 0.98240; 131066.59; 133414.69
USD/CHF SELL 11555.56K @ 1.01180 Friday, September 17, 2010, 2:42:57 PM xxx; Regular; 10303353; SHORT; USD/CHF; -11555560; 11691960.05; 1.01180; 0.98240; 339777.91; 345865.14
USD/CHF BUY 15362.942K @ 1.01761 Friday, September 17, 2010, 1:36:16 PM xxx; Regular; 10302239; LONG; USD/CHF; 15362942; -15754575.15; 1.01761; 0.98240; -540956.07; -550647.48
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[H0nza]
|
| Post subject: Re: Are they simple Coincidences ? |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Fri 24 Sep, 2010, 22:16
|
|
User rating: 0
Joined: Fri 24 Sep, 2010, 21:48 Posts: 2
|
Frank wrote: Hi Contest Support, I noted that the number of Total Trades of partecipant "ipleX" and the number of Total Trades of partecipant "daffyduck" seem increasing synchronized and even the times of trades appear similar. Are they simple Coincidences ? Could you, Constest Support, investigate, please? (verifing IP addresses, starting and ending times of strategy, ... and so on).
Best regards, Frank Now their positions looks a bit different  and when I looked at their portfolios there were traded two different pairs. Guys had similar growth probably untill your info (if you look at their equity chart) and there is difference at rate turnover/no.of trades. So there is a difference for sure. Good luck for all contestants !!!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gonzo
|
| Post subject: new account for next month needed? |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Wed 29 Sep, 2010, 21:45
|
|
User rating: -
|
|
Is it needed to register a new account for each month I want to participate in the contest or can I use the same account over several month?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Contest Support
|
| Post subject: Re: H0nza |
Post rating: 0
|
Posted: Thu 30 Sep, 2010, 08:07
|
|
User rating: 8
Joined: Wed 21 Apr, 2010, 10:42 Posts: 1167
|
|
No worries, we will investigate all accounts in the contest starting from tomorrow as today is the last day! We already have a list of suspicious trades that we would like to scrutinize.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|